Sehingga post ini dikeluarkan Dato Seri Najib masih belum bersedia dan mengumumkan akan mendedahkan laporan awal siasatan lebih kurang seminggu lagi bagi pemeriksaan akhir untuk mengelakkan maklumat yang tidak tepat. Jelas pencarian MH370 yang masuk bulan ke-2 mempunyai lebih banyak maklumat yang sahih berbanding post saya seawal 9 Mac iaitu kurang 48 jam setelah kehilangan MH370 bertajuk Pesawat MH370 telah mendarat dilokasi rahsia?
Semalam Tun Dr Mahathir pula mengeluarkan post yang sepenuhnya mengulas kehilangan MH370 dan mengecam syarikat pengeluar pesawat BOEING yang berpangkalan di Amerika Syarikat. Dalam masa yang sama negara mengalu-alukan lawatan rasmi manusia paling berkuasa di dunia Presiden Amerika Syarikat Barrack Hussein Obama yang mana Tun M tidak dijemput langsung dalam sebarang sesi pertemuan dijadualkan sempanjang lawatan itu.
Sebagai bekas Perdana Menteri Malaysia yang mentadbir negara selama lebih 23 tahun, sudah pasti maklumat yang diperolehi Tun M datang dari sumber yang bukan calang-calang untuk dipersoalkan kredibilitinya. Sekatan terhadap penyiaran kecaman beliau di laman tertentu dilihat sebagai mengganggu mood lawatan Obama yang sedang berlangsung.
Apa yang saya dapati setelah membaca ulasan Tun seperti saya sertakan dalam post ini, saya lihat sangat jelas hasil siasatan awal telah diketahui Tun dan ia menyalahkan pengurusan kawalan keselamatan MAS dan JURUTERBANGnya iaitu Kapten Zaharie Shah. Tun mengecam keras bertubi-tubi dengan sindiran tajam bahawa jika inilah yang dimaksudkan dengan kecanggihan teknologi kebanggaan BOEING maka semua kecanggihan itu tiada maknanya sekirannya ia tiba-tiba sahaja boleh setaraf atau lebih mundur sehingga dunia terpaksa bergantung dengan teknologi kurun terdahulu melalui si primitif isyarat PING satelit IMARSAT.
BOEING yang tidak mengeluarkan sebarang kenyataan walaupun dulu bermodalkan spesifikasi teknologi khayalan untuk menarik kontrak pembelian bernilai ratusan juta dollar. Secanggih mana pun teknologinya tetapi jika hanya digunakan oleh pihak tertentu sebagai helah agenda maha rahsia, maka pesawat keluaran BOEING patut dikembalikan semula oleh pelanggannya dari seluruh dunia sebagai protes atas penipuan presentasi.
Kecaman Tun juga membawa maksud bahawa spekulasi saya sebelum ini yang mengaitkan Juruterbang sebagai dalang adalah tepat. Cuma ia tidak akan menjadi misteri terlalu lama tanpa bantuan dalang berstatus mastermind seperti BOEING.
MH370 - TUN DR MAHATHIR
1. I am very upset over MAS employees being held hostage in Beijing by the relatives of the passengers of MH 370. I am upset because they are blaming the wrong people. The loss of the plane is due to the makers Boeing.
2. How can Boeing produce a plane that is so easily disabled? Normally it is entirely possible for the crew, the pilots and co-pilots to communicate even with KLIA. Maybe the captain did not want to. But surely the co-pilot would want to inform ground stations that the plane was not flying according to the scheduled route.
3. The passengers may not notice but the co-pilot would. So would the cabin crew. They are all trained to deal with emergencies if not immediately, at least later.
4. But none of them seemed to have tried. It must be because the whole communication system has been disabled. It must take some effort if the pilot tried to disable the system. The co-pilot would notice and for his own life he would have tried to do something. Was he disabled? Were all the crew members and the passengers disabled?
5. The flight of all passenger planes can be tracked even on a personal mobile phone. I can do it on my phone. If the plane landed I can watch it landing and taxiing. I can even get information on any plane anywhere – what make and model, who it belongs to and where it is flying from and its destination.
6. I believe there are equipments on the plane which allows it to be tracked – probably by Global Positioning System.
7. Sophisticated cameras on the spy-satellites operated by some countries can actually photograph a man on the ground and even identify him. Surely the cameras can see and photograph a 63-metre aircraft.
8. But the aircraft disappeared completely. I think on everyone’s mobile it has disappeared. Some equipment on the aircraft must have been disabled. Even the backup must have been disabled
9. Boeing built this aircraft. Boeing must explain how all these means of tracking the plane can be disabled, can fail. Either Boeing technology is poor or it is not fail-safe. I would not like to fly in Boeing aircraft unless Boeing can explain how all its system can fail or be disabled.
10. Remote control technology is now very sophisticated and powerful. Is it true that Boeing has installed remote control equipment on the aircraft to prevent hijacking? If it did why did it not direct the aircraft to land safely? Is it possible for third parties to take control of the aircraft remotely?
11. When a plane crashes on land or sea there would be debris or oil slick. None has been found so far. Can it be that the plane remained intact on crashing and sank with no trace and no one launching the lifeboat doors as we are told all these aircrafts are equipped with?
12. Can one believe this plane quietly floated down into the raging sea and sank conveniently in the deepest part (7miles deep) of the Indian Ocean?
13. It is standard practice that when a plane crashes, a team of experts would arrive at the scene soonest so as to find the cause of the crash. Boeing and the authorities in the manufacturing country should be looking out for the plane. Maybe the plane type should be grounded. But Boeing has shown no interest and had said practically nothing.
14. MAS has been flying numerous kinds of aircrafts and has a good record. The pilots are well-trained. Even if the pilot wants to commit suicide the co-pilot and the cabin crew would not allow him to do so without trying something. But no one, not even the passengers did anything. Maybe it is because they have been somehow incapacitated.
15. Boeing must answer all these questions. Boeing must demonstrate possible ways for the communications system to be disabled. Boeing must accept responsibility for building an aircraft that can disappear in mid-air so completely.
16. MAS is not at fault, lax security or not. MAS flew a plane fully expecting it to perform the task. But the plane has somehow behaved differently. Who is responsible? Not MAS but certainly the makers of the plane – Boeing Aircraft Corporation.
No comments:
Post a Comment